The news
The CFPB's future split across courts, Congress and the states in 2026. In September, a federal judge ordered the bureau's funding restored and Senate and House committees moved in opposite directions on its leadership and budget, while state regulators have stepped up oversight of fintech products in recent months.
On September 25, U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken in Oregon vacated decisions by Russell Vought, named in the suit as acting CFPB director, that he could not request money from the Federal Reserve when the Fed's interest expenses exceed its income and that he would not request fiscal 2026 funding, Courthouse News reported. The suit was brought in December 2025 by 22 attorneys general, representing 21 states and the District of Columbia. Aiken found the decisions contrary to law and a violation of the separation of powers, and ordered funding restored, according to the outlet and New Jersey's attorney general.
Congress pulled the other way. On September 16, the House Financial Services Committee voted 28-21 along party lines for H.R. 10184, which would end the CFPB's Fed funding and require annual appropriations. Law firm Ballard Spahr said the bill must clear three more committees and faces long odds this session. On September 17, the Senate Banking Committee voted 13-11 to advance Brian Johnson's nomination as director. Mark Paoletta has served as acting director since August 1, according to Ballard Spahr.
The bureau's capacity has already shrunk. A Federal Reserve inspector general report dated August 26 found that stop-work orders paused 274 examinations and 189 monitoring events, and that an April 2025 priorities memo directed a 50% cut in supervisory events. As of June 2026, about 17,100 consumer complaints needed manual routing, the report said. The CFPB's general counsel said the bureau had corrected overreach by the prior administration, Ballard Spahr reported.
States are filling the gap. Colorado sued earned-wage-access provider EarnIn on August 27, alleging its advances are high-cost loans. Trade groups told New York regulators, in comments due September 16, that proposed buy now, pay later rules could cut more than $500 million a year in credit to New Yorkers. Former CFPB director Rohit Chopra has led California's new Business and Consumer Services Agency since July 1.
The numbers
- Attorneys general that sued over CFPB funding (21 states and DC)
- 22
- House Financial Services Committee vote on H.R. 10184
- 28-21
- Senate Banking Committee vote on Brian Johnson
- 13-11
- CFPB exams paused by stop-work orders (Fed OIG)
- 274
- Complaints needing manual routing as of June 2026 (Fed OIG)
- About 17,100
Why CEOs should care
For fintech compliance chiefs, a weaker federal regulator does not mean lower risk. It means more regulators. Build a 50-state map of where your products are licensed, which states have product-specific rules and which attorneys general have acted on similar products. Earned-wage-access and buy now, pay later providers are the clearest targets: Colorado alleges EarnIn's advances carried an average annual percentage rate of 387.69%, and New York's proposal would require income and debt checks on each BNPL transaction.
CFOs should resist cutting compliance budgets on the assumption that federal supervision has faded. The court order, if it stands, could restore CFPB funding, and a confirmed director would set new priorities. Keep two budget scenarios: one where federal exams stay light and state enforcement drives cost, and one where a funded bureau restarts paused work. Fintechs that rely on bank account data should also plan for the CFPB's reconsidered open banking rule, which Ballard Spahr said was sent for White House review in August; the bureau earlier asked whether banks and other data providers should be allowed to charge fees for data access.
Boards should watch the calendar. The Senate leaves on October 5 and returns after the November 3 midterm elections, so Johnson's confirmation may slip. Ask management for a quarterly report on federal and state regulatory changes by product line.
The bigger picture
Consumer finance oversight is fragmenting. The federal bureau is smaller and its funding is in litigation, while states are building their own tools, from New York's BNPL rules to California's new super-agency under Chopra. Governor Gavin Newsom has described California as a backstop to what he regards as weakened federal enforcement, Ballard Spahr noted. For national fintechs, the practical effect is more supervisors with different theories, and fewer single answers from Washington.
What’s next
Watch whether the government appeals Aiken's ruling and whether the Fed transfers funds, whether the Senate confirms Johnson before October 5, and when the CFPB publishes its revised open banking proposal for comment. New York's final BNPL rule and other states' actions on earned wage access will set the compliance bar for 2027.
What “Fact-checked” means
Fact-checking means testing a story’s facts against the evidence before it is published. This story went through at least two separate checks before this version was published.
- What we checked
- Its names, figures, dates, job titles, quotes and who said what were checked against the story’s sources, including its main source where it could be opened. The headline was checked for accuracy and overstatement.
- How
- A first check reviewed the whole story. If it passed, a second, skeptical check went back to the sources to look for mistakes in the most important facts. If a check flagged the story, it was edited to fix the problems found, and a separate re-check then reviewed the whole story again.
- Who
- The checks are made by our newsroom, as steps kept separate from the writing, under rules set by our editor, Hussein Mukhtar. A story the checks still flag is held for the editor, who decides whether it is fixed, published or dropped.
- If something is wrong
- “Fact-checked” does not mean error-free. If a material error is found after publication, we correct the story and add a note saying what changed. Report an error
